A private or mixed dental practice offering general, cosmetic, and implant treatments. A mix of routine recall-driven care and high-value cosmetic/implant cases, with a patient base that should recur for years but often quietly lapses.
The core idea: In dental, the money is often already in the database. Automated reactivation of lapsed patients, plus catching the calls missed while the team is chairside, plus nurturing slow high-value cases, turns existing-but-dormant value into booked chair time.
We work with private practices. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.
A private aesthetics clinic offering injectables, skin, and cosmetic treatments to a self-paying, image-conscious, socially active clientele. Fast-moving, competitive, and highly visual, with patients who often decide quickly and book the clinic that responds first and looks best.
The core idea: In psychiatry, the enquiry is the fragile moment. A private, always-available assistant meets the patient’s courage instantly and without judgement, which in this niche is the difference between a booked patient and one who gives up.
We work with private practices. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.
A private psychiatry practice, often one to a few consultant psychiatrists, treating self-paying patients for conditions where privacy and discretion are paramount, and where the patient reaching out is frequently anxious, vulnerable, or reluctant.
The core idea: In psychiatry, the enquiry is the fragile moment. A private, always-available assistant meets the patient’s courage instantly and without judgement, which in this niche is the difference between a booked patient and one who gives up.
We work with private practices. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.
Fertility is one of the most emotionally loaded, slowest decisions in private healthcare. Patients research for months, compare clinics obsessively, and are acutely sensitive to how they’re treated at the very first touch.
The core idea: In fertility, the first reply is a care signal and the decision is slow. An assistant that responds warmly and instantly, plus content that nurtures across months, protects patients through the exact window where they’re most likely to slip away.
We work with private practices. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.
The whole business depends on one day, but enquiries arrive across all seven. With the clinician treating patients (or off) most of the week, calls, WhatsApp messages, and web enquiries went unanswered for hours or days. In a city with no shortage of physios, a golfer with a niggle who doesn’t get a quick reply simply books the next clinic that answers.
Three gaps specifically:
The core leverage: a fuller clinic day.
Admin time recovered:
Acquisition cost avoided:
Bottom line: For a clinic that runs one day a week, an always-on AI reception across WhatsApp, web, and voice is close to a perfect fit: it works the six days the clinician can’t, capturing and booking enquiries straight into Jane, so the single clinic day fills itself. Recovering just 2-3 otherwise-missed bookings a week more than covers the system.
We work with private practices. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.
This niche has a decision journey unlike most private medicine. Patients don’t book on impulse – for a multi-thousand-pound, deeply personal procedure, they research quietly for weeks or months before they’re ready to speak to anyone.
Two things were losing them during that window:
On top of this, enquiries arrived outside clinic hours and waited until the next working day, and social content wasn’t consistently bringing researching patients back to the site.
Admin time recovered:
Consultations recovered:
Acquisition cost avoided:

Bottom line: In a niche where patients research for weeks before a multi-thousand-pound decision, the combination of an always-available assistant and clear educational content does the patient work of building trust – converting quiet researchers into consultations, while recovering an estimated £2,000–£5,000+/month in acquisition costs and 6–10 admin hours a week.
We work with private practices, including clinics on Harley Street. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos — we publish what we did and what it changed.
→ Book your free Growth Audit — we’ll show you where your practice is leaking ready-to-book patients, and what it’s worth to close each gap.
Largely self-pay and consultation-led – high treatment values, patients who research carefully and expect a fast, professional response before they commit.
The only way patients came was word-of-mouth, experience, and location, and the practice couldn’t catch them once they arrived.
Enquiries from the site form and out-of-hours messages sat unanswered until the next working morning – sometimes over a weekend. For a clinic where a single consultation can lead to £350 to £5000 in treatment, every enquiry that cooled overnight was a patient booked for whichever competitor replied first.
Three gaps, specifically:

What the gap was costing (before):
→ Enquiries lost per month: 98 × 64% = 62 enquiries
→ Even if only [1 in 4] of those would have booked: 15 patients/month
→ Value at risk: 15 × £750= ≈ £11,250 per month in enquiries that were quietly leaking out of the practice.
What it costs:
Recovering just 1 otherwise-missed patient a month more than pays for the system. In the last 30 days, the clinic captured 98 enquiries that would previously have gone unanswered.
We work with private practices, including clinics on Harley Street. Out of respect for their patient relationships and privacy, we don’t name clients or publish logos – we publish what we did and what it changed.